How Do Junior High School Students Solve Problems in Non-Routine Mathematics Problems

Authors

  • Zulkipli Zulkipli Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Indonesia Tanjungpinang, Bintan, Indonesia
  • Muthiah as Saidah Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Indonesia Tanjungpinang, Bintan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i1.616

Abstract

One indicator of success in learning mathematics is problem solving ability. There are two types of mathematics questions that are generally known, namely routine and non-routine questions. Based on these reasons, the question arises of how junior high school students represent mathematically in solving non-routine mathematics problems. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research type. Data was collected using research instruments in the form of non-routine mathematics test instruments to measure students' mathematical representation abilities in problem solving. Then the subject will be interviewed about how he represents the answer to the question. The data will be analyzed by researchers using the Miles, Huberman, Saldana model to describe and provide mathematical problem solving skills. There are findings that need attention, namely the existence of differences in variations in problem solving. This can happen because students have different mathematical interpretation and representation abilities.

References

Azmidar, A., & Husan, H. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability through Mathematics Learning. Hipotenusa Journal of Research Mathematics Education (HJRME), 5(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.36269/hjrme.v5i2.969

Barrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.004

Bradbury, J. (2010). Why is Teaching with Problem Solving Important to Student Learning? Nctm.

Căprioară, D. (2015). Problem Solving - Purpose and Means of Learning Mathematics in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.332

Chandler, M. J. (2009). Piaget on Piaget. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X414169

Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2011). Analisis Representasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematika Kontekstual. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 16(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i1.273

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z

Hoe, S. L., Yeo, K. J., & Mohd Kosnin, A. (2024). The Level of Interest or Motivation With Differentiated Instruction in Blended Learning Among Low Achieving Students. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 2(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v2i2.345

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in Problem Solving-mathematics Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.901

Ita, R., & Abadi, A. P. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Sesiomadika 2019, 2(1D), 1059–1065. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/sesiomadika/article/view/2452

Krawec, J. L. (2014). Problem Representation and Mathematical Problem Solving of Students of Varying Math Ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412436976

Kurz, T. L., & Bartholomew, B. (2012). Supporting Math Skills with Children’s Stories. Kappa Delta Pi Record. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2012.734017

Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of mathematics anxiety and mathematical metacognition on word problem solving in children with and without mathematical learning difficulties. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130570

Mairing, J. P., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2011). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Peraih Medali OSN Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 18(1), 57–64. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/pendidikan-dan-pembelajaran/article/view/2758

Miles, Huberman, & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Nartani, C. I., Hidayat, R. A., & Sumiyati, Y. (2015). Communication in Mathematics Contextual. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 2(4), 284–287.

Peni, N. R. N. (2022). How does ethnomathematics work within an online platform? Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 1(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v1i1.9

Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Difficulties in Mathematical Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.728

Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development.

Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Factors Influencing Mathematic Problem-Solving Ability of Sixth Grade Students. Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.381.385

Purnama, R. N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Al Fattah Semarang. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.3.1.23-36

Putri, R. S. P., Munandar, D. R., & Zulkarnaen, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Kelas XI MIPA dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematis di SMAN 1 Setu Bekasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath : Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.25139/smj.v9i1.3337

Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v1i2.49

Saifiyah, S., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Why is Mathematical Representation Difficult for Students? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012093

Setyawati, R. D. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP ditinjau dari Self Efficacy. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2020.10.2.6627

Tambychik, T., Subahan, T., & Meerah, M. (2010). Students ’ Difficulties in Mathematics Problem-Solving : What do they Say ?, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

Tupamahu, P. Z., Ratumanan, T. G., & Laamena, C. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Representation and Communication Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 10(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i1.29376

Wulandari, W., & Idya, S. (2016). Pengelolaan Kurikulum Adaptif Matematika Pada Program Sekolah Cluster. Varia Pendidikan, 27 No 2(Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Yeliz, Y. (2015). Sixth graders and non-routine problems: Which strategies are decisive for success? Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2230

Yolida, B., Marpaung, R. R. T., & Lengkana, D. (2023). Pre-Service Teachers’: Analysis and Constraints in Making HOTS-Based Multiple Choice Questions. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 2(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v2i1.59

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Zulkipli, Z., & Saidah, M. as. (2024). How Do Junior High School Students Solve Problems in Non-Routine Mathematics Problems. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 3(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i1.616