Optimization of Link & Match in the Instructional Design Process for Students with Intellectual Disability

Authors

  • Zulfa Rahmah Effendi
  • Fajar Indra Septiana
  • Prinanda Gustarina Ridwan
  • Emay Mastiani
  • Andri Sudiarsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/picsar.v1i1.32

Keywords:

curriculum, intellectual & developmental disability, intellectual disability, instructional design, instructional

Abstract

Teaching materials that are prepared based on the actual conditions of students are one aspect that needs to be underlined so that students can actively participate in learning. This research took place at SLB ABC YPLAB Lembang, West Bandung Regency, and aims to produce teaching materials that are student center for students with intellectual disabilities in early grades. The focus of this research is on the adjustment stage between student profiles and curriculum content, where the link & match process between student assessment results and the curriculum becomes the basis for the instructional design process. The method used in this research is qualitative descriptive. There are four stages carried out, encompass initial assessment of basic abilities, reviewing curriculum content, matching student profiles with the curriculum, curriculum modification, and preparation of teaching materials. The results of this study are teaching materials that are student center to accommodate the conditions, potential, and learning characteristics of students with intellectual disabilities.

References

Al Hazmi, Adnan Nasser & Ahmad, Aznan Che. (2018). Universal Design for Learning to Support Access to the General Education Curriculum for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. World Journal of Education Vol. 8, No. 2, 2018, pp. 66-72. doi:10.5430/wje.v8n2p66

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Djamaluddin, Adhar., Wardana. (2019). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Parepare: CV. Kaaffah Learning Center.

Dufresne, Robert & Gerace, William & Mestre, Jose & Leonard, William. (2005). ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing student knowlede with instructional technology.

Eggen, Paul., Kauchak, Don. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Jaya, Frida. (2019). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Medan: UIN Sumatera Utara.

Jing, S. (2021). Discussion on the Logical Basis of Critical Thinking. International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp. 100-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20210902.14

Lu D. Students' Perceptions of a Blended Learning Environment to Promote Critical Thinking. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 25;12:696845.

Resnick, L., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. In D. D.Preiss & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Human Development. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Rochjadi, Hasan. (2016). Modul Guru Pembelajaran SLB Tunagrahita Kelompok Kompetensi H. Bandung: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Bidang Taman Kanak-kanak & Pendidikan Luar Biasa, Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Van Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–46.

Vikalista, Ellisa., Ratih Rapisa, Dewi., Ananda Putri, Adelia. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Inklusif Pada Sekolah Dasar dan Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kawasan Bantaran Sungai Martapura Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarbaru: LPPM Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, Vol. 6 Nomor 3 April 2021.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-21 — Updated on 2024-05-25

Versions

How to Cite

Effendi, Z. R., Septiana, F. I., Ridwan, P. G., Mastiani, E., & Sudiarsa, A. (2024). Optimization of Link & Match in the Instructional Design Process for Students with Intellectual Disability. Proceeding of International Conference on Special Education in South East Asia Region, 1(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.57142/picsar.v1i1.32 (Original work published September 21, 2022)