Developing PCK Assessment Instruments to Measure Teaching Competence in Arts and Culture Programs

Pranti Sayekti

doi:10.57142/jesd.v3i3.860

Authors

Pranti Sayekti State University of Malang, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i3.860

Keywords:

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Teaching Competence, Assessment Instrument, Arts and Culture PPG, Universitas Negeri Malang

Abstract

This study aims to develop an assessment instrument for Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) to evaluate the teaching competence of students in the Arts and Culture Teacher Professional Education Program (PPG) at Universitas Negeri Malang. PCK, combining content knowledge and pedagogy, is essential for effective teaching. The research follows a research and development (R&D) method, including needs analysis, design, development, validation, and testing. Data collection involved questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations. Experts validated the instrument for accuracy and relevance, while trials with PPG students tested its reliability and validity. The results show high validity and reliability, with the instrument assessing learning planning, implementation, and evaluation. It helps measure students' competence and serves as a self-reflection tool to improve teaching quality. The instrument contributes to enhancing teacher education, particularly in arts and culture, and supports efforts to increase teacher professionalism in Indonesia.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105283791.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063454.

Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204.

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

Morrison, K., & McCutcheon, G. (2011). Learning from the past: Strategies for teaching local history. Routledge.