Learning Orientation Program Social Mobility Communication for Blind Students at SLBN Tasikmalaya

Authors

  • Ainun Chaidir Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Imas Diana Aprilia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Budi Susetyo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/picsar.v3i1.427

Keywords:

Learning Communication, Social Mobility Orientation Program, Blind Students

Abstract

This research aims to describe the design and implementation of a special communication social mobility orientation program for blind students in SLBN Tasikmalaya Regency. This research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subject was one blind student. Data collection techniques were carried out by interviews and observation. Data analysis was carried out using reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The research results show that the preparation stage was carried out by carrying out identification, assessment, analyzing the curriculum and compiling teaching modules. The teaching module includes three activities, namely introductory activities, core activities and closing activities. Preliminary activities contain activities to motivate, focus attention and find out the abilities that students have mastered. In core activities, the teacher uses lecture and demonstration methods. The teacher uses clothing brought by the students. In the closing activity, an assessment is carried out. At the evaluation stage, the teacher carries out formative evaluations during the learning process and after learning. Evaluation is carried out by observation and practical tests. Recommendations for further research are to carry out intervention efforts to improve the quality of learning, such as making innovations in media, teaching materials and assessments.

References

Ambarita, Alben. (2006). Manajemen Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Direktorat Ketenagaan.

Hidayat, A.AS. & Suwandi, A. (2013). Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Tunanetra. Bandung: Luxima.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No.81 A tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Program Pengembangan Kekhususan: Pedoman Pengembangan Orientasi Mobilitas, Sosial Dan Komunikasi untuk Peserta Didik Tunanetra.Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kurniawan, Yoga Rizki. “Pembelajaran Orientasi Mobilitas Sosial Dan Komunikasi Terhadap Kemandirian Toileting Siswa Tunanetra.” Pendidikan Khusus 12, no. 3 (2019): 5

Majid, Abdul. (2012). Perencanaan Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ratnasari & Pamuji. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung untuk Meningkatkan Orientasi Mobilitas Anak Tunanetra di Pendidikan Khusus Negeri Seduri Mojosari. Jurnal Pendidikan khusus. 1-11

Riyana, Cepi. (2009). Komponen-komponen pembelajaran. Modul 6. Bandung UPI.

Rudiyati, S. (2002). Pendidikan Anak Tunanetra. Yogyakarta: FIP UNY.

Sudijono, Anas. (2007). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 7. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta

Tarsidi, Didi. Dampak Ketunanetraan terhadap Perkembangan Keterampilan Sosial Anak. UPI Bandung.

Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2013). Exceptional Lives: Special Education In Today’s Schools.Seventh Edition. USA: Pearson..

Utomo & Nadya Muniroh. Pengembangan orientasi & Mobilitas Siswa Tunanetra. Nizamia Learning Center

Widjaya, A. (2013). Seluk Beluk Tunanetra dan Strategi Pembelajarannya. Yogyakarta: Javalutera

Yudhiastuti, Anita. Azizah, Nur. “Pembelajaran Program Khusus Orientasi Mobilitas Bagi Peserta Didik Tunanetra Di Sekolah Luar Biasa.” PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran 3, No. 1 (2019)

Downloads

Published

2024-05-25

How to Cite

Chaidir, A., Aprilia, I. D., & Susetyo, B. (2024). Learning Orientation Program Social Mobility Communication for Blind Students at SLBN Tasikmalaya. Proceeding of International Conference on Special Education in South East Asia Region, 3(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.57142/picsar.v3i1.427

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>