Social Participation Differences between SEN and TD Student in Indonesian Inclusive Primary School: A Mixed Method Study

Authors

  • Lemuel Wilson Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Weny Savitry S. Pandia Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Maria Wirastari Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i1.104

Keywords:

inclusive education, SEN, special education, social participation, special needs

Abstract

SEN students have some characteristics that differentiate them from Typical Development (TD) in social aspects. They tend to have poor social skills and sometimes come up with behavioral problems. Children with TD and sometimes teachers have overall negative attitudes that make their social life even more difficult. This study aimed to prove is there any differences between SEN and TD primary school students’ social participation and factors that influenced it. 252 regular and 30 SEN students involved in a causal-comparative study for four aspects of social participation. Fieldwork used two sociometric questionnaires and a Peer Social Self-Concept instrument. Results indicated that there are differences between social interaction, peer acceptance, reciprocal friendship, and peer social self-concept. Explanatory case studies in two schools with positive and negative social participation revealed that peer acceptance, reciprocal friendship, and social interaction influenced by disabilities type and negative attitude towards SEN. Besides, peer social self-concept influenced exclusively by negative attitudes towards SEN. School management, education about social matters for SEN, TD, and parents expected to improve social participation in SEN.

References

Asuero, A. G., Sayago, A., & Gonzalez, A. G. (2006). The correlation coefficient: An overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36(1), 41-59.

Avramidis, E., Avgeri, G., & Strogilos, V. (2018). Social participation and friendship quality of students with special educational needs in regular Greek primary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(2), 221-234.

Biggs, E. E., Carter, E. W., & Gustafson, J. (2017). Efficacy of peer support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(1), 25-48.

Chhabra, S., Srivastava, R., & Srivastava, I. (2010). Inclusive education in Botswana: The perceptions of school teachers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20(4), 219-228.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Chhabra, S., Srivastava, R., & Srivastava, I. (2010). Inclusive education in Botswana: The perceptions of school teachers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20(4), 219-228.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(4), 379-392.

Diahwati, R., Hariyono, H., & Hanurawan, F. (2016). Keterampilan sosial siswa berkebutuhan khusus di sekolah dasar inklusi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(8), 1612-1620.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Gunarhadi, S., Anwar, M., Andayani, T. R., & Shaari, A. S. (2016). The effect of cluster-based instruction on mathematic achievement in inclusive schools. International Journal of Special Education, 31(1), 78-87.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2011). Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Inklusif. Jakarta: Direktorat PPK-LK.

Kiuru, N., Poikkeus, A. M., Lerkkanen, M. K., Pakarinen, E., Siekkinen, M., Ahonen, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2012). Teacher-perceived supportive classroom climate protects against detrimental impact of reading disability risk on peer rejection. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 331-339.

Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & Van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117-140.

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Roberts, C. M., & Smith, P. R. (1999). Attitudes and behaviour of children toward peers with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(1), 35-50.

Santrock, J. W. (2013). Life-Span Development (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schwab, S. (2015). Social dimensions of inclusion in education of 4th and 7th grade pupils in inclusive and regular classes: Outcomes from Austria. Research in Development Disabilities, 43(44), 72-79.

Schwab, S., Gebhardt, M., Krammer, M., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2015). Linking self-rated social inclusion to social behaviour. An empirical study of students with and without special Education in secondary schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933550

Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892-909.

Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can Teachers’ Self-Reported Efficacy, Concerns, and Attitudes Toward Inclusion Scores Predict Their Actual Inclusive Classroom Practices? Australasian Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 21-38.

Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.

Sunardi, Yusuf, M., Gunarhadi, Priyono, & Yeager, J. L. (2011). The implementation of inclusive education for students with special needs in Indonesia.

Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114-130.

UNESCO Bangkok. (2009). Towards inclusive education for children with disabilities: A guideline. Bangkok: UNESCO.

Watkins, L., O’Reilly, M., Kuhn, M., Gevarter, C., Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., & Lang, R. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070-1083.

Willig, C. (2013). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Wilson, L. ., Pandia, W. S. S. ., & Wirastari, M. . (2024). Social Participation Differences between SEN and TD Student in Indonesian Inclusive Primary School: A Mixed Method Study. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 3(1), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v3i1.104