Preparing for AI's Transformational Potential: Rethinking Teacher Education in South Africa

Authors

  • Kudzayi Savious Tarisayi Stellenbosch University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v2i2.87

Keywords:

Teacher education, Artificial intelligence, Competency-based learning, Educational technology

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly reshapes education, teacher training must evolve to effect positive change. This paper analyses strategies for rethinking teacher education in South Africa to integrate AI competencies. With over 420,000 teachers facing challenges like under preparation and classroom diversity, AI's personalized capabilities could assist instruction. However, actualizing this potential requires teacher training reforms aligned to pedagogical goals. Grounded in competency education and social cognitive theories, this paper recommends four priorities: hands-on AI workshops modelling differentiation, scaffolded online learning, peer sharing networks, and expert coaching via digital badging. Analysis suggests these approaches develop AI integration competencies through situated learning while upholding humanistic aims. Recommendations emphasize competency-based progression focused on pedagogies like differentiation in diverse contexts. Online modules provide fundamental knowledge before experiential application. Peer communities enable collaborative mastery through observation and exchange. Expert mentoring guides contextualized skill development, verified through credentials. This competency focus promotes agency and recognizes teacher knowledge. Rethinking teacher education will be crucial as South Africa transforms education. Adopting strategies like competency mentoring and sharing networks can empower teachers to direct change. Sustained, aligned policies supporting teacher professionalization will complement training. With teachers guiding integration, AI can enrich learning experiences. This paper offers principles and evidence-based strategies for human-centred teacher education reform.

References

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., and Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.

Glaser, B. G. (2016). Open coding descriptions. Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 108–110.

Hattie, J. and Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York, NY: Routledge.

Jiao, P. (2020). Teachers’ AI competence in China. Beijing International Centre for Educational Research.

Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in Action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. A Journal for Engaged Educators, 1(1), 7-44.

Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Huang, H. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022c). A review of artificial intelligence-supported elearning: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Computers and Education, 171, 104260.

Opfer, V.D., Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in online higher education. Journal of Computers in Education. Advance online publication.

Patrick, S., Kennedy, K., and Powell, A. (2013). Mean what you say: Defining and integrating personalized, blended and competency education. International Association for K-12 Online Learning.

Ruggiero, D., & Mong, C. J. (2015). The teacher performance assessment: Lessons learned and recommendations for implementation of edTPA. Action in Teacher Education, 37(2), 121–139.

Ruggiero, D., and Mong, C.J. (2015). The teacher technology integration experience: Practice and reflection in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 161-178.

Sharma, K., Soetan, A., and Kingshott, R. P. J. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100024.

Spaull, N. (2013). South Africa’s education crisis: The quality of education in South Africa 1994-2011. Johannesburg: Centre for Development and Enterprise.

Tang, T. L., Ng, Q. R., & Tytler, R. (2022). Elaborating a sustainable framework for cross-disciplinary AI research and education. Sustainable Futures, 4, 100052.

UNESCO. (2021). Teacher AI module series. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/teachers/teacher-education/free-resources/teacherai

Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). The future is here: Shaping how teaching and learning are changing through technology. In M. Henderson, W. Hick, & A. Herrington (Eds.), Enhancing Undergraduate Education: A Holistic Approach. Springer.

Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. (2022). A self- determination theory (SDT)-based design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 104582.

Yang, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Exploring the association of learning analytics use and Taiwanese secondary students’ self-efficacy in reading and writing. Computers and Education: AI, 2, 100029.

Zawacki-Richter, O., and Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245-269.

Zhao, X., & Gao, Y. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing, and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi Tech, 40(1), 80–97.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-08

How to Cite

Tarisayi, K. S. . (2023). Preparing for AI’s Transformational Potential: Rethinking Teacher Education in South Africa. Journal of Education for Sustainability and Diversity, 2(2), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.57142/jesd.v2i2.87